Showing posts with label can-con. Show all posts
Showing posts with label can-con. Show all posts

Sunday, January 18, 2009

5) With Dream Comfort Memory to Spare: Barbara Gowdy's Helpless



Book Read: Helpless
Author: Barbara Gowdy
Pages: 306

Distraction level: I was reading another book and got disgusted with it so I threw it across the room and picked up this one instead. I began it last night and finished it this morning. It's a thriller (disguised as a Governor General Award contender) so I automatically felt a breathless sort of compulsion to finish it. Unfortunately, I have to go back and deal with the other book now, on the floor in the corner, its pages akimbo, its spine bent.I've also been busy watching videos like this. Over and over and over.

*Yes, I've used "Nabokovian" as a tag in this entry, and yes, I know it makes me sound like a total asshole. There's a reason I'm using it! The next book that I'm finishing (the one I threw across the room) will need this tag too! Oh....Christ. Anyway.

It's hard out there being a pedophile. That's one of the issues Gowdy explores in Helpless, and as distasteful as that notion sounds, she pulls it off. But for her, the world of the displaced outsider is a familiar theme. In an interview at the back of the book, Gowdy says her obsessions are "attachment, the need for humans to attach themselves to other humans, and how helpless we all are before this need." It all sounds sort of vague and broad until you look at Gowdy's body of work. She's written about an insanely dysfunctional Canadian family with a suicidal matriarch (in Fallen Angels, which remains my favorite of all of her books) and a woman who spends her entire life pining after a distracted waify artist-type (The Romantic) Most famously, Gowdy wrote a story about a woman who is quite literally in love with death in her short story We So Seldom Look Upon Love which later formed the basis of the dreamy and surprisingly lovely movie Kissed (otherwise known as "that Canadian movie about necrophilia.")

Basically Gowdy excels at adding depth and humanity to characters who we might otherwise consider repugnant. Helpless is a novel about mothers and daughters, dads and sons, girl children, kidnapping and repressed pedophilia. And, yeah, it all deals with obsession too. At the forefront is the dilemma raging within Ron, a schlubby vaccum cleaner repairman who considers himself a Humbert Humbert-esque "connoisseur of beauty," particularly when it comes to beautiful young girls. He spies the stunning nine-year-old Rachel walking home from school one day and the wall between his "morality" and his desire comes tumbling down. You might see where this is going---Ron eventually ends up taking Rachel to a room in his basement. In the book's creepiest touch, Ron bedecks it with Barbie dolls, Disney DVDs and a dollhouse in an attempt to recreate the childhood scenario that led him to his love of girl children in the first place. Ron attempts to justify his behaviour to his girlfriend (and to us) by rationalizing that Rachel is growing up in an unfit home with a single mother who plays piano at a bar and works at a video store for a living. Through the third-person subjective, Gowdy then lets the story unfold through the eyes of Ron, his girlfriend, Rachel and her long-suffering mother Celia, who has some mommy/daughter issues of her own to grapple with in addition to coping with Rachel's disappearance.

I was really split by Helpless. On one hand, it's compelling because Gowdy constructs a fast-paced and solid narrative. Her characters are well-written and certainly believable in their reactions to the situation---no doubt in part because Gowdy spent months exhaustively researching cases of missing children in Toronto and speaking with members of the police force about their own experiences.

But I can't entirely say I liked it. And it has to do with Gowdy's attempts to humanize a man who is attracted to pre-pubescent girls. (And it's not because I think it's gross, or upsetting - we should be reading novels like these and talking about them. Gowdy knows there's a line that most of her readers don't want crossed---and well, she doesn't. If you want to be truly horrified by an unredeemable child molester, check out the narrator of A.M. Homes' The End of Alice. Or, you know, don't.)

It is fascinating to see the way Gowdy allows Ron to grapple and justify Rachel's captivity using his own skewed rationality. At the same time, he struggles to minimize the harm caused by a situation that has spiralled out of his control. He's not stupid or blinded by his misplaced affections---he knows this won't end well. He's aberrant, but he's not necessarily a monster. In some ways, this makes his character suffer from a dearth of personality---and there's not a lot of subtlety to Gowdy's portrayal of this supposedly conflicted person. And right up to the book's final, not particularly shocking conclusion, we are reminded that Ron, in some ways, is a fatalistic romantic; not through exposition or his actions, but through explicit statements. I could have used more showing and less telling, to use a well-worn phrase spouted by many of my old journalism profs.

Fuck. I feel like I screwed the pooch with this review, to borrow a well-worn phrase from my grandly and gloriously crass man friend. Okay. Helpless is a challenging book that should make a lot of middle-class people of a certain age angry. Gowdy is the type of author who can approach this subject in an intelligent and graceful way, and in some ways, with the research and such, she's succeeded. But I think she's done better work when it comes to constructing characters who baffle the reader, leaving the book shrouded in a sort of lovely mystery that we're not supposed to fully understand. This could have been her swan song, and instead, it's akin to the sound of a goat yelling like a man---initially it's slap-you-in-the-face jarring, then compelling, eventually tedious and ultimately a bit forgettable.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

1) Jpod: Enough Already




Book Read:: JPod

Author: Douglas Coupland

Pages:516

Favorite quote: "Dad and Kam Fong began talking shop and drinking heavily, while blousy women in their forties, radiating imminent divorce and sexual despondency, tried to get their attention."

Least favorite quote: Some line about how the main character's mom looked angrier than Mr. Burns. I can't find it now.

Method of Acquisition: My boyfriend received this book for Christmas two years ago. He refused to finish it (for reasons I will explain later) and it has sat quietly on the shelf accumulating dust during this time.

Distraction level: Moderate at first. I'm finally getting into The Wire and was chewing my way to the end of Season 1 while simultaneously reading JPod. As most of you know, it is almost impossible to stop watching The Wire especially once you have reached the mid-season point. You may die or go blind. Bad things will happen. I did my best.

Background: Okay. So like most Canadian people in a certain age bracket, I really like Douglas Coupland. In theory. I read Shampoo Planet when I was seventeen and was like "Oh my God, this is very culturally intense and sophisticated and I will never understand it because I'm young and ugly." Then I read Microserfs a few years later and was delighted that Coupland not only referenced stuff that I was aware of or becoming aware of (Bill Gates, Star Trek, FedEx, Riot Grrls) but he also referenced social phenomena that my friends and I already talked about (i.e. the thin fat person.) Plus, it was wrapped around these charming dorky characters and a story that ended up being surprisingly moving. Plus, he was Canadian. Who knew Canadian writers could be so cutting-edge? Douglas Coupland not only gave me an enjoyable literary experience, but he made me feel like I was IN on a giant generational joke; that I GOT something. It was nice.

So what happens when Douglas Coupland seemingly runs out of new ideas and decides to recycle Microserfs for the Google/Macbook generation? You get JPod.

Plot: JPod is very, very similar to Microserfs. Microserfs was about a group of young people who worked in close quarters as programmers for Microsoft. JPod is about a group of young people who work in close quarters at a gaming company as designers. Both groups of characters are socially awkward and eccentric (in JPod, we're even treated to one character's thesis about how all her co-workers display various degrees of autism.) Both books feature pages of experiments with font, binary coding, prime number patterns, stream-of-consciousness rambles and other visual nods to technology, communication and computers. Both books feature a character named Ethan.

Feelings, Ranting: I have no idea if these similarities were deliberate---I'm sure there's lots of interviews with Coupland about this subject and to be honest, I don't really care to go searching for them. Because JPod sucks.

While Microserfs had characters with hearts who actually seemed to be affected by the events that took places in their lives, JPod is static---even as characters utter rapid-fire witticisms and the plot jumps a mile a minute.
In some of Coupland's other novels, these devices are charming, but the level of cultural awareness amongst the characters in JPod goes beyond savvy or even interesting. It's just numbing.

A lot of things happen in JPod---a character is kidnapped and forced to work in a Chinese sweatshop making fake Nikes, someone builds a hug machine, a mother goes through a string of affairs with seemingly no consequence or reflection and the game programmers invent a violent gore game featuring Ronald McDonald. Out of context, it all seems amusing, but in the book each event is just another blip in a series of seemingly programmed plot points.

Cartoon Conspiracy?: For example, the characters constantly compare each other to the The Simpsons. But it's not the way you or I would quote The Simpsons---in JPod, it's done in this very weird, disembodied way that simply doesn't work. It got to the point where I was like, "What the fuck is with all the The Simpsons comparisons? Is this a special Douglas Coupland book code that I'm supposed to innately understand? Oh my God, I hate you!" It's as if Coupland was searching for a cultural reference that would resonate with the younger audiences reading this book, and chose The Simpsons as an afterthought. It's weird and uncomfortable.

My boyfriend gave up on the book when Coupland himself appeared as a character halfway through the story. Yes, he really does, and yes, it is as much a "what the fuck?" moment as anything you'll read in that insane Bret Easton Ellis biography/horror novel about himself (??) Lunar Park. I kept going because a) I am a masochist and I'm determined to finish every book I start in the competition, no matter how shitty and b) I really had hope things would get better.....

Spoiler Alert: JPod's characters are such blank slates that when the grouchy meta-Coupland offers them a business proposition to help design a multimedia globe that mimics and predicts world conditions (don't ask---just borrow the book from me and skip to the end) you almost breathe a sigh of relief that their meaningless jabbering will be focused on a task with a unified outcome. Also, it signified that the book was almost over.

Final Thoughts: Maybe I'm a giant idiot and the meaninglessness of the book is the point. There are a couple of moments in the book where characters lambast each other for having no real personality. I've also heard that Coupland intended to sacrifice the narrative aspects of JPod to focus on the book's design as a literary version of Web 2.0 and some other garbage about ripping off Marshall Macluhan, or something. Either way, I don't care if this is supposed to be art, or some sort of comment on Google society, or Generation K, or whatever---if I don't care about the characters or the plot, then why should I care about the book's "medium" or especially its message? Douglas, Douglas. You can do better.

Final consensus: Boo-urns.