Showing posts with label families. Show all posts
Showing posts with label families. Show all posts

Sunday, January 18, 2009

5) With Dream Comfort Memory to Spare: Barbara Gowdy's Helpless



Book Read: Helpless
Author: Barbara Gowdy
Pages: 306

Distraction level: I was reading another book and got disgusted with it so I threw it across the room and picked up this one instead. I began it last night and finished it this morning. It's a thriller (disguised as a Governor General Award contender) so I automatically felt a breathless sort of compulsion to finish it. Unfortunately, I have to go back and deal with the other book now, on the floor in the corner, its pages akimbo, its spine bent.I've also been busy watching videos like this. Over and over and over.

*Yes, I've used "Nabokovian" as a tag in this entry, and yes, I know it makes me sound like a total asshole. There's a reason I'm using it! The next book that I'm finishing (the one I threw across the room) will need this tag too! Oh....Christ. Anyway.

It's hard out there being a pedophile. That's one of the issues Gowdy explores in Helpless, and as distasteful as that notion sounds, she pulls it off. But for her, the world of the displaced outsider is a familiar theme. In an interview at the back of the book, Gowdy says her obsessions are "attachment, the need for humans to attach themselves to other humans, and how helpless we all are before this need." It all sounds sort of vague and broad until you look at Gowdy's body of work. She's written about an insanely dysfunctional Canadian family with a suicidal matriarch (in Fallen Angels, which remains my favorite of all of her books) and a woman who spends her entire life pining after a distracted waify artist-type (The Romantic) Most famously, Gowdy wrote a story about a woman who is quite literally in love with death in her short story We So Seldom Look Upon Love which later formed the basis of the dreamy and surprisingly lovely movie Kissed (otherwise known as "that Canadian movie about necrophilia.")

Basically Gowdy excels at adding depth and humanity to characters who we might otherwise consider repugnant. Helpless is a novel about mothers and daughters, dads and sons, girl children, kidnapping and repressed pedophilia. And, yeah, it all deals with obsession too. At the forefront is the dilemma raging within Ron, a schlubby vaccum cleaner repairman who considers himself a Humbert Humbert-esque "connoisseur of beauty," particularly when it comes to beautiful young girls. He spies the stunning nine-year-old Rachel walking home from school one day and the wall between his "morality" and his desire comes tumbling down. You might see where this is going---Ron eventually ends up taking Rachel to a room in his basement. In the book's creepiest touch, Ron bedecks it with Barbie dolls, Disney DVDs and a dollhouse in an attempt to recreate the childhood scenario that led him to his love of girl children in the first place. Ron attempts to justify his behaviour to his girlfriend (and to us) by rationalizing that Rachel is growing up in an unfit home with a single mother who plays piano at a bar and works at a video store for a living. Through the third-person subjective, Gowdy then lets the story unfold through the eyes of Ron, his girlfriend, Rachel and her long-suffering mother Celia, who has some mommy/daughter issues of her own to grapple with in addition to coping with Rachel's disappearance.

I was really split by Helpless. On one hand, it's compelling because Gowdy constructs a fast-paced and solid narrative. Her characters are well-written and certainly believable in their reactions to the situation---no doubt in part because Gowdy spent months exhaustively researching cases of missing children in Toronto and speaking with members of the police force about their own experiences.

But I can't entirely say I liked it. And it has to do with Gowdy's attempts to humanize a man who is attracted to pre-pubescent girls. (And it's not because I think it's gross, or upsetting - we should be reading novels like these and talking about them. Gowdy knows there's a line that most of her readers don't want crossed---and well, she doesn't. If you want to be truly horrified by an unredeemable child molester, check out the narrator of A.M. Homes' The End of Alice. Or, you know, don't.)

It is fascinating to see the way Gowdy allows Ron to grapple and justify Rachel's captivity using his own skewed rationality. At the same time, he struggles to minimize the harm caused by a situation that has spiralled out of his control. He's not stupid or blinded by his misplaced affections---he knows this won't end well. He's aberrant, but he's not necessarily a monster. In some ways, this makes his character suffer from a dearth of personality---and there's not a lot of subtlety to Gowdy's portrayal of this supposedly conflicted person. And right up to the book's final, not particularly shocking conclusion, we are reminded that Ron, in some ways, is a fatalistic romantic; not through exposition or his actions, but through explicit statements. I could have used more showing and less telling, to use a well-worn phrase spouted by many of my old journalism profs.

Fuck. I feel like I screwed the pooch with this review, to borrow a well-worn phrase from my grandly and gloriously crass man friend. Okay. Helpless is a challenging book that should make a lot of middle-class people of a certain age angry. Gowdy is the type of author who can approach this subject in an intelligent and graceful way, and in some ways, with the research and such, she's succeeded. But I think she's done better work when it comes to constructing characters who baffle the reader, leaving the book shrouded in a sort of lovely mystery that we're not supposed to fully understand. This could have been her swan song, and instead, it's akin to the sound of a goat yelling like a man---initially it's slap-you-in-the-face jarring, then compelling, eventually tedious and ultimately a bit forgettable.

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

2) Running With Scissors: Memoirs and Crazies




Book Read: Running With Scissors
Author: Augusten Burroughs
Pages: 331
Favorite quote: "I am paranoid about serial killers. Any of Finch's patients could be one. Especially that crazy lady who owns the Blue Moon Grill in Easthampton. I just look at her and she creeps me out. She looks like she would eat a baby. Not that she's fat. She just looks hungry in some dangerous way that can't be explained."
Method of acquisition: Bought in Chapters with a gift certificate. Supercheap. Paperback.
Distraction level: Moderate. I am now on season two of The Wire and it continues to suck up my life. Damn you, Bunk! I am counteracting this problem by reading during lunch breaks; this is helpful.

Background: My bookish pal friend Dave passed me Burroughs' story of his battle with alcoholism, Dry, a couple of years ago, with a resounding "bleh." He was not a fan. I read it largely while hungover. It was funny, sad and nauseating. The book implies that his alcoholism is rooted in his undoubtedly shitty and bizarre childhood, which is chronicled the earlier memoir Running with Scissors.

All Familes Are Psychotic? The basic facts (and plot) follow. Burroughs was given away by his batshit-crazy matchstick-eating aspiring-poet mother to her psychiatrist and his family. They are also crazy. The psychiatrist's adopted son begins raping the 13-year-old Burroughs and they eventually develop a relationship. Burrough's father, also an alcoholic, disappears during this time (although he reappeared this year in a sense when Burroughs published the rather tellingly-titled Wolf At The Table.)
So basically, I'm just letting you know that my understanding of Burroughs' messed-up life is all out of order. So what? You're out of order.

The Memoir: Platform of the Whiny?: Here's the thing. Some memoirs are fantastic. We have all read amazing memoirs about people who have lived through war, extreme poverty, police states, abuse and so on. Then there are some stories that are simply so deliciously and magically sensational that you absolutely can't. stop. reading. (The Dirt is one of my favorite books of all time. Don't judge until you read it.) Some memoirs, though, are indulgent and stupid. I am an overprivileged North American, and generally I don't like reading books written by other overprivileged North Americans. They're whiny. The exceptions to this rule are David Sedaris, because his books have made me laugh so hard that I cried, and Burroughs.

Family Circus:There's definitely an indulgent aspect to Burroughs' story. The young boy that comes of age in Running With Scissors is a nascent celebrity whore if I ever saw one. If the young Burroughs didn't have intelligence and talent on his side, he could have been a 1970's Captain and Tennille-chasing Perez Hilton. Thankfully, the man can write, and the story he shares is compelling enough that I stayed with it even as certain moments strained credulity. The greatest flaw of Running With Scissors is that some of its characters are so sketchily drawn that we end up not caring about them anymore, while you can't help but care about Burroughs, his dysfunctional "sister" and partner-in-crime Natalie Finch and even his creepy, pedophilic, manipulative and desperately needy "lover" Bookman. Aside from these three, though, I didn't give a shit about anyone in the book---especially Burroughs' mother. Crazy or not, the woman was a heartless shrew.

The book's style is also a bit distracting as it falls into a rhythm of Sedaris-like vignettes about forgotten Christmas trees and fortune-telling turds. Don't get me wrong---it's interesting and sometimes it's really, really funny. But when these little interludes are interspersed with entire chapters about rough gay sex and lunatic violence, things get uneven.

The true tragedy of Burroughs' upbringing is threaded throughout the book. For me, that's what stuck. Burroughs has a wonderful ear for dialogue and it's through his conversations with Natalie and Bookman that we see what the book is really about: loss, numbness, and coping with the infinite disappointment and fuckery of a truly dysfunctional upbringing. In that light, Burroughs' story is one of Survival---with none of the saccharine or sentimental trappings associated with the term. And it's certainly one worth reading.